A modern hiring workflow laid out on a wide, matte-white desk: a central high-resolution monitor displays a clean dashboard of shortlisted candidate profiles represented as abstract avatar icons, with clear visual indicators of qualifications and experience. Around it, tidy stacks of printed resumes with highlighted sections, a minimalist calculator, and a transparent jar half-filled with neatly labeled cost-saving tokens emphasize budget efficiency. Cool, diffused light from a nearby window brightens the scene, while subtle shadows add depth. Shot from a slightly elevated angle in photographic realism, the composition feels organized and calm, suggesting a streamlined, low-cost recruitment pipeline that delivers highly qualified candidates with minimal effort from the employer.

Agency-Free Pricing

Know exactly what each hire costs, with transparent flat fees at one-third of agency rates.

Pricing

Essential Search

From $1,500 per successful hire—typically around one‑third of what traditional agencies charge for the same role.

✓ Role scoping

✓ Candidate sourcing

✓ First interviews

✓ Shortlist delivery

Growth Search

Flat 12% of first‑year salary on hire only, compared to the 20–30% contingency fees most recruiting agencies demand.

✓ Senior roles

✓ Multi-channel sourcing

✓ Structured interviews

✓ Priority delivery

Savings

On a $90,000 hire, typical agencies charge $18,000–$27,000. Our flat $3,500 fee saves $14,500–$23,500 per role, while we handle sourcing, screening, and interviews for you.

A sleek, glass-walled conference room table presented as a strategic hiring command center, covered with neatly organized candidate profile folders, color-coded analytics dashboards on slim laptops, and a tidy stack of offer letters. In the background, a large digital display shows a clear, upward-trending efficiency graph and a bold comparison of reduced hiring costs using simple icons instead of text. Soft, even office lighting reflects gently off the polished tabletop, creating a professional, trustworthy atmosphere. Photographic realism at eye level, with a shallow depth of field that keeps the main table items in crisp focus while the high-tech background softly blurs, conveying efficiency, precision, and cost-effective recruiting success.

Results

Rating: 5 out of 5.

We cut our average cost-per-hire from $19,000 to under $6,000, and the candidates were better prepared than those from big-name agencies.

— Aya Nakamura

Rating: 4 out of 5.

They managed sourcing and first-round interviews for six roles; we just met finalists and hired four, spending roughly one-third of what agencies quoted.

— Lila Patel

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Our HR team regained weeks of bandwidth. Instead of screening resumes, we focused on onboarding great people at a fraction of traditional recruitment costs.

— Mateo García

Rating: 5 out of 5.

The pricing was refreshingly straightforward—no percentage of salary, no surprises—just a flat fee for thoroughly vetted, ready-to-hire candidates.

— Aya Nakamura